Re: Re: Exhaust

From: Tom Byrne (kerib@ptd.net)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:22:46 EST


I was only going to tow my 1100 pound boat and trailer combo now and then. I
am wondering if A body headers will fit. Hooker makes headers for the 89 for
$300+ but Hedman makes A Body headers for under $200.
Tom Byrne
84 Charger 2.2 FSP
99 Neon DOHC Coupe.
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the
inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
Winston Churchill

----- Original Message -----
From: "Victor" <dohcrt@msn.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: DML: Re: Exhaust

>
> Hey Tom, The step bumbers are only rated for around 200 pounds tounge and
> 2000 pounds total trailer weight! Spend the $150 and install a class III.
> The one on my 92 used existing holes and took me about 1 hr to install. If
> you plan on towing I would recommend this direction. Teh magnum and non
> magnum heads are different so you will have to get some older style
headers.
> Unfortunately 89 (Shelby) and 91 Dodge were the only 2 years of the non
> magnum V-8 in the Dakota so some parts are a pain to find and some trial
and
> error is in order. I have a 92 and my friend has a 91 so we go through
this
> all the time. If you have any other questions let me know. Good luck...
>
> Vic in Phoenix
>
> dohcrt@msn.com
>
> 92 Spirit R/T
> 89 CSX
> 88 CSX-T
> 87 Shelby Lancer
> 84 Rampage TII
> 92 Dakota 4X4
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Byrne" <kerib@ptd.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 8:18 AM
> Subject: DML: Exhaust
>
>
> >
> > Will 5.2 Magnum shorty headers fit an older 318? Also how much weight is
> the
> > step bumper hitch rated for on a Shelby Dakota?
> > Tom Byrne
> > 84 Charger 2.2 FSP
> > 99 Neon DOHC Coupe.
> > The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the
> > inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
> > Winston Churchill
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:57 EST