I beleive there may be a clearance issue with the 96 linkage ontop of a
92/93 rail. I know the 95 style linkage will hit the return style rail. I
will test the 96+ style linkage on a spare manifold/rail I have tomorrow.
Greg Conner
1996 RC
3.9 hybrid
>From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <fasstdak@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Subject: DML: RE: Holley Billet TB on 1992?
>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:32:59 -0500
>
>
>No problems (you know about the linkage already)....may be a bit big for a
>stock 318 though without some decent mods. (Looks like you're gonna have
>that covered though)
>
>- Bernd
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
>kvmac45@comcast.net
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:19 AM
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: DML: Holley Billet TB on 1992?
>
>
>Will the Holley TB fit on a 1992 Dakota? Considering getting a 52mm one off
>an R/T. I know the throttle linkage is different so new throttle cables
>would be needed. Would I have any other clearance issues with the fuel rail
>or anything?
>
>Would it be worth it to even consider going to a 52mm one? Currently I have
>the stocker that has been ported and polished by hand. Not perfect but did
>make a big difference. The engine has high miles on it but will eventually
>be replaced with a new shortblock 318 with R/T heads and possibly a S/C, or
>a low mileage 360 and build it up. Thanks.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 11:38:59 EDT