Re: RE: RE: Trans. Temp. [delivery failure to kw@m1.sprynet.com]

From: Interserv Operations (postmaster@sprynet.com)
Date: Thu Aug 20 1998 - 18:43:11 EDT


The message that you sent to the above recipient was not delivered. All mail
sent to this account will continue to be returned until the recipient has
removed enough mail to lower the mailbox size below the system mailbox limit.

--

Sprynet Network Operations Center Postmaster@sprynet.com 2001 6th Ave. Suite 3025B noc@interserv.net Seattle, WA. 95121 CompuServe/Internet Division

-----[ Orginal mail message follows ]-------------

> > Alan, > The TCI trans pan PN 128000 would NOT fit my 1998 (not deep enough) but > it would fit my 1995. I chose to use the B&M PN 10280 because I didn't > realize > that TCI had a (4 extra qt) 727 pan PN 128001. The B&M pan cost is > approx. $120.00 through JEGS. All have drain plugs. The "Y-pipe" is not > a problem. In response to an earlier post, you really cannot run an > automatic too cool. Make sure you measure to get a pan that will work > for you..... > Frank > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mok, Alan (SPB Brentwood) [SMTP:AMok@spbank.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 2:43 PM > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net > > Subject: RE: DML: RE: Trans. Temp. > > > > TCI make an aluminum finned pan that holds 2 extra quarts of fluid (I > > assume it's deeper) for the 727, part no. 128000 > > > > Will this fit an R/T (46RE)? I haven't looked under there lately but I > > recall the Y-pipes are in the vicinity. I'll take a closer look when I > > do the headers this weekend. > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > '98 Dakota R/T (headers and FABM, what about shift kits?) > > '89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs, S-trim and the list goes on...) > > '88 x-CHP Mustang LX (daily beatings from a teenager) > > Ducati 916 (someday) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Holloway,Frank T > > [mailto:Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG] > > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 1:58 PM > > To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net' > > Subject: RE: DML: RE: Trans. Temp. > > > > Bob, > > The 44RE has the same pan bolt pattern as the "904" > > tranny. Mopar > > Performance has a pan for the 904 PN P4120162 but it is > > NOT deep enough > > to fit. > > B&M does not make a pan to fit the 904 but TCI does. The > > TCI PN is > > 127900 and can be ordered through someone like JEGS, > > (price approx. > > $81.00). What you > > would need to do is to measure the stock tranny pan from > > the tranny down > > and then call TCI and find out if their pan is deep > > enough. The pan is a > > finned aluminum > > item that holds an additional 2 qts over the stock 904 > > pan (remember > > yours is deeper than a stock 904). You may not need the > > pickup extension > > that they ship > > with the pan. I personally have not worked on the 44RE > > but I do think > > this is worth checking into. > > The 42RE & 46RE trannys have the same bolt pattern as > > the old TF-727. I > > used the Moper Performance PN P4120161 on my 95 46RE. I > > did not need the > > pickup > > extension supplied with the pan. Sometime around 98 > > Dodge changed the > > valve body / filter arrangement in the 46RE. I needed to > > use the finned > > aluminum B&M > > 727 pan on my 98, additionally I needed to remove the > > fins within the > > pan to provide clearance for the filter. Again I did not > > need to run the > > pickup extension with > > with this combination. B&M PN 10280. I also run an > > external oil filter > > and a cooler (stacked plate type). With this > > combination, tranny fluid > > changes take 8 Qts. > > Frank > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bob Mankin [SMTP:bob@cadpros.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 11:01 AM > > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net > > > Subject: Re: DML: RE: Trans. Temp. > > > > > > Holloway,Frank T wrote: > > > > > > > > Hay Charlie, > > > > 260 Degrees is pretty warm... Have you ever thought > > about an > > > aftermarket > > > > cooler, or a different trans. pan. > > > > I try to keep mine around 220 when towing. > > > > Frank > > > > > > Frank, > > > > > > If memory serves, didn't you go over a list of > > possibilites for tranny > > > pans a couple weeks back? I attempted to buy one last > > week and came up > > > empty-handed. And when a B&M pan runs $180, maybe > > that's better > > > anyway<grin>. > > > > > > Would still like to install one if it's not cost > > prohibitive. Any > > > suggestions for a 44RE? > > > > > > Bob >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:24 EDT