jim miller wrote:
>
>
>
>> Subject: DML: Dyno numbers
>> I need some help here to compare dyno # with
>> somebody else that have dyno tested a complete
>> stock R/T 5.9 and a regular 5.2. I dyno tested
>> my -99 R/T CC 5.9 today and got really
>> disappointed. Here are some numbers: 3700rpm /
>> 247ft/lb torque4700rpm / 189 HP Please get
>> back to me with some # that I can compare
>> with, I think the factory have installed a 5.2
>> in my truck. I will check it at work on
>> Monday, and if they have..............well
>> lawsue comes to mind, because they charge me
>> $1585 extra for a 5.9I would like if you could
>> e-mail me direct instead of to the list. Swede
>> at Huffines Dodge
>>
> Sometimes I wonder the same thing about my 99 R/T RC.
> Everybody tells of their traction problems with the R/T
> and the Motor Trend video showed an R/T smooking the tires
> quite easily. Mine doesn't. The only way my R/T will
> burn rubber is if I power brake it or really stand on it
> from a stop and then it burns off maybe 3 or4 feet only.
> Exactly the same as my 98 RC Sport did with the same 3.92
> SG and the 318 V8. If I feel any more power in the R/T it
> is probably $25 more not $1,500 more.
> Jim in Waco.
> 99 R/T RC 800 miles on odo.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:01 EDT