Re: Re: Stock Cam spec.

From: Dak99RT@aol.com
Date: Wed Mar 24 1999 - 00:07:00 EST


In a message dated 3/23/99 11:18:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, bernd@texas.net
writes:

> One question here:
>
> Looking at the Dyno Sheet at: http://www.dhc.net/~erich/stockdyno.htm
>
> If this is a 5.9L R/T, why is the Corrected HP so low? Something wrong
with
> the motor or the Dyno?
>
> 189.2HP @ 4700rpm / 247ft-lb @ 3700 - SAE or Actual? Doesn't make any
sense
> when the V6's are rated at SAE 175HP. 14.8HP Difference? The TQ figures
> look correct though.
>
> Not trying to imply anything, but something doesn't make sense

The dyno measure rear wheel horsepower. So you would have to add the
drivetrain loss to get the factory 250 HP. If Dodge's 250 Horse power rating
is true and my calculations are correct... Swede's R/T has about 32% drive
train loss... awful! For me too as I own an R/T. It should be somewhere around
18%... from what I recall.
Charles



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:20 EDT