I replaced my stock single system with a dual system all the way back to the
bumper on my 94.
-----Original Message-----
From: George Dorn <gdorn@newlywedsfoods.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Tuesday, August 04, 1998 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Exhaust question
>Shaun.Hendricks@bergenbrunswig.com wrote:
>>
>> stuff for awhile. Now I'm a bit curious. Wouldn't the best thing for
>> high-flow through exhaust be to keep the flow split apart, run smoothly
into
>> two separate high flow Caltyletic Converters, two separate high flow
mufflers,
>> and dump the exhaust immediately under the truck? I'm pretty certain
this
>> would void the warranty, but for preformance issues, isn't this better?
>>
>> Shaun
>> Tustin, CA
>I'de like to second that question to all u guys/gals,I've got what
>Shaun described above on my Shelby & I would think that it would be
>an entirely less effective system than a single,sooner or later
>i'de like to go w/something "louder" muffler wise,right @ the moment
>there r 2,3 chamber mufflers that I was told are a off a Z-28 system.
>How's come all yous guys are stayin w/the single's & aren't going
>to a dual system ????
>geo.----'89 Shelby Dakota #288
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:18 EDT