Re: Was Gas Mileage -now: V6 vs V8

From: Aaron (acolona@i-55.com)
Date: Thu May 20 1999 - 18:43:15 EDT


I have nothing against the v6. There are more 6's in my area than 8's. But
the v6 is underpowered for a truck the size of a dak. And for that matter.
Has anybody ever even seen a 4, there is one 4 cyclinder on the lot where I
bought my truck and it hasn't moved since I bought mine.............that was
almost 8 months ago!!!

Aaron C.

if anyone on the list has one, what kind of performance does it have, or not
have.

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Howe <robbii@pacbell.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 1999 4:44 PM
Subject: DML: Was Gas Mileage -now: V6 vs V8

> >Okay, bring on the slamming from the v6 guys......I know it's coming.
> >
> Some of us 6ers are happy with their 6. It's not necessary for us to have
> that excess power when the 6 is still good enough to out perform many
other
> comparable vehicles on the road, including some v8's. So what's the point
> for us to spend the extra money that we could use on other things, like
gas.
> I will admit, that if I was buying a NEW Dak, the 8's would be my choice,
> BUT since my stock 6 will spank any stock Ranger, S-10, Toy, whatever,
there
> is a sence of pride in that. Though, spanking a Stang in a truck, has its
> privilages. :)
>
> -Robert Howe
> 1995 V6 4x4 5-Speed
> Bone Stock :(
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:08 EDT