3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?

From: Jack Hilton (HEMI@charter.net)
Date: Thu Sep 09 1999 - 10:18:41 EDT

Next message: Joseph DaVolio: "Re: 4x4 with 3.90?"
Previous message: Geoffrey Hackbart: "Re: dml and R/T's?"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: Bob Tom: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Patrick Delgado: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: The Man From Utopia: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: gmvega: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Just checking out the Dodge web site and was curious .

You have a choice now of either the standard 3.92 , or the 3.55 at a $40
option .

Now , could maybe the 3.55 do well in 1/4 racing because there would be
less chance of traction loss off the line and more potential top-end MPH ?

Definitely should do better at the gas pumps .

----------------------------------------------

Jack Hilton III

Black 1998 Dodge Dakota R/T Club Cab

Charter Pipeline......the Next Wave.....

HEMI@charter.net

http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html

----------------------------------------------

Next message: Joseph DaVolio: "Re: 4x4 with 3.90?"
Previous message: Geoffrey Hackbart: "Re: dml and R/T's?"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: Bob Tom: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Patrick Delgado: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Reply: The Man From Utopia: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: gmvega: "Re: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Maybe reply: Mooberry, J: "RE: 3.55 or 3.90 in an R/T ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:40 EDT